La Yijad en Eurabia

El presidente iraní Ahmadineyad va a organizar una conferencia sobre el Holocausto. Atención a la agenda…

Ojalá fuera todo broma…
The Onion

Tags: Noticias sorprendentes por AMDG
1 Comment »

… a cambio de que este país deje de enriquecer uranio durante 8 o nueve años. Con ello, Irán podría ganarse la confianza de la comunidad internacional, al mostrar que están interesados solo en la energía nuclear, no en las armas.

Parece broma, pero lo dijo en la reunión del Foro Económico Mundial. Estoy pensando que esas reuniones internacionales son una farsa, tal como las retrata Santiago Segura en su Torrente 3.

¿Ya puestos, sr. Mojamé, no sería mejor darles los misles nucleares directamente? Así, podríamos comprobar definitivamente si sus intenciones son pacíficas?
Lo leí en Dhimmi Watch. Este es el artículo completo.

Tags: Crisis nuclear, Irán por AMDG
1 Comment »

Esta es una selección del programa electoral del grupo terrorista que ha ganado las recientes elecciones en Gaza y Cisjordania:

• The establishment of a moral Islamist Palestinian state, as opposed to the corrupt West. (…) In the Islamist Palestinian state, every citizen will be required to act in accordance with the codes of Islamic religious law, already instated, as he says, in the Palestinian Authority administered territories, in which matters of constitution, marriage, inheritance, acquisition, and selling are based on Islamic laws.

¿Un estado moral? Hum, no se habrán enterado de que la virtud obligatoria lleva al terror?. Es un decir, de hecho son un grupo terrorista.

• Criticism over the corruption and permissiveness that prevail in Western countries. Throughout the entire interview, Mahmoud al-Zahar stressed that the Hamas movement had Islamic ideology and culture and that the Islamist Palestinian state would have no interest in holding contacts with Christianity or Western countries, where corruption runs rampant. Within this context, he criticized the permissiveness that prevails in Western countries (bringing up the permissiveness in Sweden as a negative example).

En eso tienen la razón, si seremos corruptos que estamos dándoles dinero a espuertas a quienes nos rebanaran el cuello.

• Hamas’ view of the Taliban. Mahmoud al-Zahar rejected the claim that the Hamas movement was willing to reenact the Taliban’s experience in Afghanistan , saying it was a false claim raised by Israel and the US . Speaking in a condescending tone, Al-Zahar said that the Hamas movement was not a replica of the Taliban but rather its superior.

Pues tampoco me parece muy tranquilizador…

• The corrupt nature of the Palestinian Authority as opposed to the virtuous nature of Hamas’ worldview. The way Mahmoud al-Zahar described Hamas’ political platform presents an obvious antithesis to the Palestinian Authority. It is, according to Al-Zahar, a corrupt Authority, cooperating with the (Israeli) “enemy”.

• Total avoidance of cooperation with Israel and termination of expressions of normalization with it. The Islamist Palestinian state will totally avoid cooperating with Israel in the fields of security, politics, or economy.

Renuncian a los fondos de Occidente, a trabajar con y en Israel… ¿Y de qué van a vivir, de la caridad saudí? Por mi fantástico, eso será lo que nos ahorremos. Espero que Occidente no insista en su corrupta obsequiosidad.

• Vagueness with regard to integrating Hamas’ military infrastructure into the security apparatuses of the future Palestinian Authority. In the future, said Al-Zahar, a formula will be found that will allow both sides to cooperate for the sake of the “national interest”.

Osea, que van a mantener su ejército privado paralelo. Fascismo puro, es decir, islamofascismo.

• Blaming the Palestinian Authority for the anarchy while making it clear that Hamas will refuse to disarm, even if it enters the Legislative Council.

Esto confirma lo anterior.

• The continuation of the violent confrontation against Israel until its annihilation.

• Mahmoud al-Zahar attributes to the Zionist movement the desire to take over the region between the Euphrates and the Nile and expresses a radical worldview seeking to establish an Islamic Palestinian state across the entire territory of Palestine, including the territory of the State of Israel.

Sobran comentarios. Hay otros puntos, pero vayamos ya a la conclusión:

In summary, Hamas’ worldview with regard to the makeup of the Palestinian state, as it is reflected in Al-Zahar’s interviews, is as follows: A Palestinian state of radical Islamic character, an extension of the radical Islamic stream led by the Muslim Brotherhood, which holds close contacts with Islamic Arab countries. It is a state where secular and non-Islamic (Christian) elements will be forced to embrace radical Islamist codes in all walks of life; it is a state that does not cooperate and severs its ties with Israel and Western countries, holds close contacts with other Islamic Arab countries (obviously, with radical Islamic movements as well), and embraces a strategy of armed struggle (i.e., terrorism) against Israel until its annihilation.

En dos palabras: Transformar lo que hasta ahora era llamado “Palestina” en Hamastán, una república islámica fundamentalista. Literalmente:

Such a state would be, in fact, of a radical Islamic nature. It will be run by Hamas, the state of “Hamastan”. Indeed, when asked by a Newsweek reporter (August 30, 2005) whether the Gaza Strip would become “Hamastan”, Mahmoud al-Zahar responded: “It should be Hamastan.”

¿Y nuestro ministro Moratinos trabajaba para quitarles de la lista de grupos terroristas de la UE?

Lo he tomado de Haganah, un blog excelente que Fjordman recomendó leer a diario cuando él cerró su quiosco. Lee el artículo entero.

Tags: Israel-Palestina, Rusia por AMDG
3 Comments »