Encuentro esta información en una noticia a la que ya me referí ayer (British Taxpayers Forced to Pay for More New Muslim Specific Social Housing):
“The Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years, according to official research collated for The Times.
Lo más flagrante del caso es que acaba de confirmarse que se trata de una política premeditada de la izquierda para “tocar las narices a la derecha” (Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser):
Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a “truly multicultural” country, a former Government adviser has revealed.
The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”.
As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within Government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.
Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.
Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.
He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.
He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.
He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
“I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.”
The “deliberate policy”, from late 2000 until “at least February last year”, when the new points based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Some 2.3 million migrants have been added to the population since then, according to Whitehall estimates quietly slipped out last month.
Ahora decidme si no deberían haber una revuelta que acabara con los responables (Toni Blair y sus muchachos) ajusticiados en la plaza pública. Cuando uno lee noticias como estas piensa inmediatamente que NUNCA, NUNCA, NUNCA traicionaron a sus pueblos de manera semejante esos reyes del “Antiguo Régimen” que en los libros de texto que estudian nuestros hijos son descalificados por autoritarios, absolutistas, etc.
Estas son las consecuencias de la “democracia”. Mientras tanto, los franceses festejan “la Revolución que acabó con los privilegios del Antiguo Régimen” cada 14 de julio. Así de fácil es engañar al pueblo “soberano”.