Visto en Cordelia for Lear (Dalai lama the homophobe):
«A gay couple came to see me, seeking my support and blessing. I had to explain our teachings. Another lady introduced another woman as her wife – astonishing. It is the same with a husband and wife using certain sexual practices. Using the other two holes is wrong.»
«A Western friend asked me what harm could there be between consenting adults having oral sex, if they enjoyed it, but the purpose of sex is reproduction, according to Buddhism. The other holes don’t create life. I don’t mind – but I can’t condone this way of life.
«We have to make a distinction between believers and unbelievers. From a Buddhist point of view, men-to-men and women-to-women is generally considered sexual misconduct».
«Buddhist sexual proscriptions ban homosexual activity and heterosexual sex through orifices other than the vagina…»
«A sexual act is deemed proper when the couples use the organs intended for sexual intercourse and nothing else….Homosexuality, whether it is between men or between women, is not improper in itself. What is improper is the use of organs already defined as inappropriate for sexual contact.»
«sex spelled fleeting satisfaction and trouble later, while chastity offered a better life and more independence, more freedom. Problems arising from conjugal life could even lead to suicide or murder.»
Si las dijera el Papa se habría armado un escándalo monumental, como las dice el Dalia Lama no pasa nada…
Entiendo que el Papa es probablemente la persona más odiada por la progresía, mientras que al Dalai Lama lo consideran un freak inofensivo (como al budismo en general) y por eso le perdonan las majaderías (no es este el caso) que pueda decir.
En universidad norteamericana
Con la Pelosi.