Debemos desmantelar la Unión Europea, y pronto.
Nos referimos aquí (¿Se ha quedado obsoleta la Nación-Estado?) a un artículo de Fjordman, que concluía que era necesario desmantelar la Unión Europea. En el mismo día publicó este bloguero un artículo en que explicaba porqué: Why the EU Needs to be destryed, and soon. Esto puede sonar extrañísimo en un país europeísta como el nuestro, primero en ratificar un tratado consittucional que le perjudicaba. Precisamente por eso tratamos de él aquí.
El artículo empieza con una declaración rotunda: “La Unión Euroepa debe morir, si no morirá Europa”. Recuerda al juego de palabras con que se celebró la muerte de Carlos I (y V de Alemania), el emperador-rey que además de gastarse los generosos impuestos de sus ricos reinos y el oro de las Américas, dejó la hacienda real en la bancarrota al no poder pagar los empréstitos de Fúcares y ginoveses: “Si el rey no muere, el reino muere”.
Otra de las cosas que llama la atención es la comparación de la Unión Europea con la Unión Soviética. Según un antiguo disidente soviético la UE está en camino de convertirse en la nueva URSS:
In an interview with Paul Belien of the Brussels Journal in February 2006, former Soviet Dissident Vladimir Bukovksy warned that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet Union, an EUSSR as some people call it. In a speech he delivered in Brussels, Belgium, Mr Bukovsky called the EU a “monster” that must be destroyed, the sooner the better, before it develops into a fully-fledged totalitarian state.
Como puede parecer algo forzado, aquí están algunas razones:
Bukovksy replied negatively to Belien’s question whether the member countries of the EU didn’t join the union voluntarily, and that the integration thus reflects the democratic will of Europeans. “No, they did not. Look at Denmark which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is almost blackmail. It is a trick for idiots. The people have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would call a shotgun marriage.”
Pues no se puede negar que es así. Y hay más:
In 1992, Bukovksy had unprecedented access to Politburo and other Soviet secret documents. According to him, some of these documents “show very clearly” that the idea of turning the European common market into a federal state was encouraged in agreements between the left-wing parties of Europe and Moscow as a joint project which Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1988-89 called our “common European home” “Of course, it is a milder version of the Soviet Union. I am not saying that it has a Gulag.”
“The idea was very simple. It first came up in 1985-86, when the Italian Communists visited Gorbachev, followed by the German Social-Democrats. They all complained that the changes in the world, particularly after [British Prime Minister Margaret] Thatcher introduced privatisation and economic liberalisation, were threatening to wipe out the achievement (as they called it) of generations of Socialists and Social-Democrats – threatening to reverse it completely. Therefore the only way to withstand this onslaught of wild capitalism (as they called it) was to try to introduce the same socialist goals in all countries at once.
No me dirán que no les suena la cantilena contra “la Europa de los mercaderes” y a favor de una mayor integración política… Aquí tenemos la reacción del masón –y perista del caníbal Bokasa- que pergeñó el tratado consitucional europeo ante el rechazo del bodrio por parte de sus compatriotas:
Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, former French President and chief drafter of the awful EU Constitution, an impenetrable brick of a book of hundreds of pages without any of the checks and balances of the American Constitution, has argued that the rejection of the Constitution in the French and Dutch referendums in 2005 “was a mistake which will have to be corrected.” “The Constitution will have to be given its second chance.” He said the French people voted No out of an “error of judgement” and “ignorance”, and insisted that “In the end, the text will be adopted.” “It was a mistake to use the referendum process, but when you make a mistake you can correct it.” Mr Giscard d’Estaing indicated that the treaty could be put to French voters in a second referendum, or be ratified by the French parliament. “People have the right to change their opinion. The people might consider they made a mistake,” he said on a possible new referendum.
Las convicciones democráticas del Grado 33 no parecen demasiado profundas. Veamos ahora este detalle sobre la forma en que se inician las leyes europeas:
En 2005, an unprecedented joint declaration by the leaders of all British political groups in Brussels called for PM Tony Blair to push for an end the “medieval” practice of European legislation being decided behind closed doors. Critics claim that the Council of Ministers, the EU’s supreme law-making body, which decides two thirds of all Britain’s laws (and the majority of laws in all Western European countries), “is the only legislature outside the Communist dictatorships of North Korea and Cuba to pass laws in secret.” As one of the signers put it: “We still have this medieval way of making decisions in the EU; people hide behind other member states, and blame them. It increases people’s sense of cynicism, but what we need is some straight talking.”
Léelo entero, que hay más: Why the EU Needs to be Destroyed, and Soon
