Primero. Desde hace una década se ha acelerado la tendencia a la islamización de las principales ciudades europeas.
Lo cuenta un profundo ensayo de Brussels Journal. Salimos bien parados, gracias a los «españoles del otro hemisferio», que han envitado que esto se llene de islamistas agresivos. Suecia, Holanda, Reino Unido y Francia están experimentando ya grandes problemas. Con muchas zonas en las que el «hombre blanco» no puede poner el pie.
Beheading Nations: The Islamization of Europe’s Cities
Segundo. Indoeuropeos, historia medieval inglesa, vikingos, anglos, sajones, normandos, derecho consuetudinario frente a derecho romano, sociedades jerárquicas (mediterráneas) frente a sociedades abiertas (atánticas)… podrían ser los tags del artículo. Tiene también un punto de delirio, el mismo que, en su día, inspiraría al perturbado padre del PNV y del desvarío vasco:
Their northern practice was represented by the yeomanry, the society of free-born petty landholders, who governed themselves by time-honored Anglo-Saxon custom.
This is not to say that the Anglo-Saxons had no hierarchy. However, it was a shallower and more fluid system than its Pharaonic counterpart. Anglo-Saxon governance was based on the prowess and virtue of those who were deemed noble, and instead of a Pharaoh there was a Cyning, a King, who represented his folk as their exemplar, rather than as their ruler.
A yeoman’s rights were granted directly to him by God and could not be revoked by his sovereign. The Normans, in order to rule their new lands successfully, were required to recognize the “ancient liberties” of their Anglo-Saxon subjects. When his rebellious barons compelled the Norman King John to sign the Magna Carta in 1215, they were simply retaking their ancient liberties. The customs of the men of the North thus survived despite the Normans and became the English Common Law.
La propuesta de que la idea de derechos naturales -o, como dicen aquí, que Dios habría concedido derechos inalineables al campesino al yeoman (al campesino libre, valga el pleonasmo)- surgió entre las nieblas hiperbóreas me da una risa considerable. Pero dejémoles soñar, que son sueños edificantes.
Tercero. Una vez más, la inmigración y sus peligros. Habla Fjordman:
Unrestricted immigration from failed states will eventually destroy global centres of excellence, the same way Communism did. Browne also confronts the assertion that “mass immigration is normal, irreversible and beneficial to host societies” as a “damaging illusion. (…) The process can and should be stopped, in the interests of the rich diversity of nations it will otherwise crush.” “In 1924, the US government passed legislation that effectively closed the door on European immigration, opening the door to immigration from poor countries with new legislation only in 1965. Australia has shown in recent years that tough policies can reduce illegal immigration to virtually zero.” “Pro-immigration campaigners who tell the people of Europe that ‘mass immigration cannot be stopped’ are adopting the policies of despots through history of quelling opposition by telling opponents that resistance is futile. All that is needed is political will.”
In Europe, the one nation that has proved to be most successful in technology, ”Nokia nation” Finland, is also perhaps the one country within the EU that has accepted the least amount of immigration.
“Immigration can’t solve the pensions crisis, nor solve the problem of an ageing population, as its advocates so often claim. It can, at most, delay the day of reckoning, because, of course, immigrants themselves grow old, and they need pensions.” “The injection of large numbers of unskilled workers into the economy does not benefit the bulk of the population to any great extent. It benefits the nanny-and housecleaner-using classes; it benefits employers who want to pay low wages; but it does not benefit indigenous, unskilled Britons.”
José Zapatero, Spain’s Prime Minister, said during a visit to the Canary Islands that his country would “spare no resources” to curb illegal immigration from Africa. However, his Socialist government launched an amnesty for more than 600,000 illegal immigrants the year before, thus greatly encouraging more illegal immigration.
La inmigración masiva que estamos padeciendo es consecuencia de las políticas de la izquierda. Esta inmigración no es positiva, no crea apenas valor añadido, solo favorece a las clases superiores. La inmigración no puede solucionar la creisi de las pensiones, ni el envejecimiento de la población. El éxito tecnologico de Finlandia y Japón se ha producido con una inmigración prácticamente nula. No es inevitable, Finlandia ha sabido evitarla, Suecia no. Solo hace falta corage político.
Lo que me hace gracia es cuando la gente dice que a si se incrementa la natalidad. Digo yo, no sería más factible que se estudiasen y arreglasen las causas de nuestra baja natalidad en vez de ir tapándoo con más inmigrantes. Que pasa, que cuando ellos se adapten a nuestro país van a seguir teniendo hijos, no van a tener los mismos problemas que los españoles de ahora. Yo creo que tapar el problema con inmigrantes es pan para hoy y hambre para mañana.